Thus Atwood clarifies how wicked women are perceived in literature using the enduring power of her intellectual and artistic qualities. Throughout Spotty-handed villainesses, Atwood uses many language features and techniques that help her complex ideas get through to the audience. How to Write a Summary of an Article?
The speeches set for study mould responders into co-authors whereby being engaged by the speeches enduring power of their intellectual and artistic qualities, and their audiences embrace the speeches worthy messages.
The abundance use of religious references is another attempt by Sadat in a context where both countries were highly religious to unite individuals together and compel them to look over past prejudices and hatred.
And so using the enduring power of intellectual and artistic qualities, Atwood reveals her point of view of how male and female characters in novels should behave.
This tip actually applies to all English Modules, but it is particularly important for this Module, you need to avoid analysing the speeches in isolation, remember the bigger umbrella that the texts of this module falls into is called "The Critical Study of Texts" and so you should be finding common themes, common rhetorical structure or similar use of rhetoric techniques to engage the respective contextual audiences of the speeches and link them together, usually, linkage by themes is the most common type of essay questions, although some essay questions does specify the importance of structure, but in this instance, you still need to highlight how the structure exemplifies the key concerns across the speeches.
Throughout Spotty-handed villainesses, Atwood uses many language features and techniques that help her complex ideas get through to the audience. There is a reason why these speeches are selected together, and it is because they are powerful examples of rhetoric, though uttered in different contexts and by people from vastly different walks of life, has never the less managed to engaged audience emotionally and intellectually over an extended period of time and has often made a significant impact through history.
The title of the speech is paradoxical, as well as introduces a major extended metaphor used by the speech on prize-winning in relation to opportunities to access books, education and recognition for one's achievements.
It is an absolutely fascinating speech noting how mediocre, boring experiences of reporting statistics for the races can allow individuals to accumulate great insights into the craft of writing, at the end of the day, if there is one thing this speech teaches us, it is that everything is about perspective.
Evaluation of language, content and construction requires a judgment of how effective the speaker has achieved their aim, how effective have they used the tools of rhetoric literary techniques as well as the careful structuring of their speech to compel their audience to sustain interest.
By juxtaposing such extreme visions Sadat forces his audience to agree with his point by appealing to a common goal of a better future. Anwar Sadat and Margaret Atwood Anwar Sadat and Margaret Atwood Practice Essay These two speeches through their enduring power of intellectual and artistic qualities connected and compelled their audiences to reassess and challenge the message within their speeches.
We will write a custom essay sample on Anwar Sadat and Margaret Atwood or any similar topic only for you We will write a custom essay sample on Anwar Sadat and Margaret Atwood or any similar topic only for you Order now Atwood negates this viewpoint with an overview of wicked women.
Perspectives of others can also include the perspectives of your classmates and English teacher, so make sure you listen carefully in class and jot down any interesting perspectives, it might stimulate a renewed understanding of what the speeches are about.
Anwar Sadat — Speech to the Israeli Knesset This speech was a groundbreaking speech in terms of transforming all conventions of political diplomacy, and should be considered and evaluated in light of the various bilateral conflicts that Israeli and Egypt has been involved with each other over the previous decades prior to the making of this speech.
Paul Keating — Redfern Speech This speech was significant as it was made in the context of a recent pronouncement of one of the greatest Australian cases of recent decades, that of the Mabo decision in Atwood questions how characters in novels should behave.
Atwood supports her ideas with language techniques and features making her speech worthy of critical study. The content of the speech refers to the often timeless themes that are perpetrated in the speeches selected. It is an absolutely fascinating speech noting how mediocre, boring experiences of reporting statistics for the races can allow individuals to accumulate great insights into the craft of writing, at the end of the day, if there is one thing this speech teaches us, it is that everything is about perspective.
Essentially, the Mabo decision determined that the phrase 'terra nullius' the land belonging to no onea phrase which was used as a key justification by European settlers in the colonisation of Australia as well as the many terrible wrongdoings that were subsequently perpetrated to the Indigenous population, most notably in the Stolen Generation, was wrongfully applied to Australia and that Indigenous people could have the opportunity to claim native title to lost lands if strict conditions were met, one of them being they needed to show a continual connection with the land, but this was often impractical since if Indigenous people were driven off from their land by white settlers who subsequently often used the land for commercial or residential purposes, how do they show a continual connection to the land?
The difficulty of this speech mainly lies from the fact the audience was to an educated group who were assumed to have an extensive literary knowledge of different characters in different English texts. This was the beginning of Egyptian interest in reaching a diplomatic solution, which later resulted in the Camp David peace agreement.
Often you can find these by searching through the website archives of key media websites, such as Sydney Morning Herald and The Australian.
Sadat believes a landmark change of course is needed and the governments must arise above all forms of fanaticism and value life. The repetition of this phrase emphasises the point and makes sure the audience will remember it.
However, having said this, you can focus on three or four main speeches where you know particularly well, I could highly recommend you to make sure one of the longer speeches, such as Atwood or Sadat's speech is in this selection.
Essentially, to show your appreciation of textual integrity of the speeches, you need to demonstrate that whatever idea you are dissecting from the speeches, it is present throughout the entirety of the speech, and not just through a sentence or paragraph of the speech.
The important point about this is you should, if you have time, track down how other people have viewed the speeches, i.
If there is one thing to be learned from this speech, it is to treasure our lives as we are living it. Pearson references a lot of famous historians, who you may not know, so it pays to actually look them up, essentially the main argument is we should create a version of Australian history that includes both the good and bad, not just the gallant Gallipoli legends, but truly recognise how we unlawfully dispossessed Indigenous people off their land and how we deprive them of fundamental human rights, through this act of recognition to reverse biased representation of history of Australia, we can be a step closer to reconciliation.
Atwood criticises extreme feminists. In conclusion I believe that both speeches by, Anwar Sadat and Margaret Atwood, through their enduing power of intellectual and artistic qualities, and in much detail have given their audiences an enormous amount of information about their topics.
Through critical analysis and evaluation of its language, content and construction, students will develop an appreciation of the textual integrity of their prescribed text. It will provide you with an informed understanding of how effective and resonant the speeches has remained within and beyond their respective contexts.Speeches: Anwar Sadat – Speech to the Israeli Knesset, Paul Keating – Redfern Speech, Margaret Atwood – ‘Spotty-Handed Villainesses’, Mod B Speeches entailing exemplar essays based of speeches of Anwar Saadat, Noel, Pearson exploring the needs of change and contextual values and beliefs.
2nd Essay exploring Margaret Atwood & Deborah Lessing’s speeches on the importance of language and social change, both essays are exemplar essays. These speeches are nonfiction texts within the "Critical Study of Text" Module B in the HSC English Standard course.
In conclusion I believe that both speeches by, Anwar Sadat and Margaret Atwood, through their enduing power of intellectual and artistic qualities, and in much detail have given their audiences an enormous amount of information about their topics.
Learn mod b theory speech with free interactive flashcards. Choose from 82 different sets of mod b theory speech flashcards on Quizlet. Essay Margaret Atwood and Anwar Sadat Speeches. What makes the selected speeches worthy of critical study? Margaret Atwood’s Spotty-Handed Villainesses () and Anwar Sadat’s Statement to the Knesset () are both speeches worthy of critical study because of their fascinating ideas and values.Download